in Vienna, Austria - a meeting organized by United European
Gastroenterology for specialists to communicate the latest research in
digestive and liver diseases.
Although wheat was only added to the human diet around 12,000 years ago,
it has become a major dietary staple and is widely used in processed
foods. One group of proteins found in wheat - amylase-trypsin inhibitors
(ATIs) - has been shown to trigger an immune response in the gut that
can spread to other tissues in the body.
ATIs are plant-derived proteins that inhibit enzymes of common parasites
- such as mealworms and mealybugs - in wheat. ATIs also have an
important role in metabolic processes that occur during seed
development.
Many previous studies have focused on the impact of gluten on digestive
health. However, lead researcher Prof. Detlef Schuppan, from the
Johannes Gutenberg University in Germany, and team aimed to highlight
the
in digestive health and beyond.
ATIs only make up a small amount of wheat proteins - around 4 percent -
yet the immune response they induce significantly affects the lymph
nodes, kidneys, spleen, and brain in some people, causing
. ATIs have also been suggested to exacerbate
, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, as well as inflammatory bowel disease.
"Instead, we demonstrated that ATIs from wheat, that are also
contaminating commercial gluten, activate specific types of immune cells
in the gut and other tissues, thereby potentially worsening the
symptoms of pre-existing inflammatory illnesses," Prof. Schuppan adds.
Some individuals experience stomach symptoms when eating foods with
ingredients containing gluten - such as wheat, barley, and rye - even if
they do not have celiac disease. ATIs may contribute to this non-celiac
gluten sensitivity (NCGS). This area of research is relatively new, and
more research needs to be conducted to understand NCGS and who is at
risk.
There are currently no biomarkers for NCGS to monitor a patient's
status, and based on current understanding, no intestinal damage has
been indicated in people with NCGS after exposure to gluten. Healthcare
providers, as a result, rely solely on symptom resolution to observe
whether intervention improves the condition.
Prof. Schuppan notes that the team's research could help redefine the
condition to a more appropriate term: "Rather than non-celiac gluten
sensitivity, which implies that gluten solitarily causes the
inflammation, a more precise name for the disease should be considered."
Researchers are currently preparing studies to investigate further the
effect of ATIs on chronic health conditions. "We are hoping that this
research can lead us toward being able to recommend an ATI-free diet to
help treat a variety of potentially serious immunological disorders."
Prof. Schuppan concludes.
Read about how gluten-free diet is gaining popularity, despite no rise in celiac disease
“Gluten” is basically a buzzword at this point, but even if you’re avoiding it, do you really know what it
is? And did you know that there’s other stuff in wheat that’s also worth avoiding:
wheat is bad news for reasons that have nothing to do with gluten. Here’s a look at 11 reasons why.
The Basics
First of all, a refresher: wheat is a grain. The calories in wheat
come mostly from carbohydrates, but wheat also contains a few problem
proteins.
- Gluten
- Wheat Germ Agglutinin
- Amylase Trypsin Inhibitors
Problems caused by these proteins are not the same thing as blood sugar problems caused by the carbohydrates in wheat. It’s true that getting a majority of calories from wheat (especially refined wheat) can cause metabolic problems like blood sugar swings. But these problems would be caused by any high-carb diet, and they’re only relevant for people eating a
large amount of wheat: something like a spoonful of soy sauce wouldn’t be a problem.
This post is not about metabolic issues like blood sugar and carbohydrates. It’s about a totally different list of
problems caused specifically by wheat and the proteins it contains. These problems are relevant even for people eating a small amount of wheat, and even for people who do fine eating carbs.
So what’s so bad about wheat?
1. Wheat Problems Aren’t Restricted to People with Celiac Disease
The most famous problem with wheat is celiac disease,
an autoimmune reaction provoked by gluten and treatable with a
gluten-free diet. 30-40% of people have the genetic background to
potentially develop celiac disease, but only about 1-3% of people
actually do – it’s not clear why but it may have something to do with
the gut microbiome.
Most people know that celiac disease requires absolutely strict
avoidance of all gluten. But a lot of people also think that if you
don’t have celiac disease, you’re completely in the clear.
That’s not true. Recently there’s been an increased amount of interest in non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS).
Plenty of people have documented sensitivities to gluten that aren’t
actually celiac disease (as you’ll read below, there’s a different
immune reaction involved). There’s also the overlapping problem of other
proteins in wheat – wheat germ agglutinin and amylase trypsin
inhibitors are not the same thing as gluten and you can be sensitive to
them regardless of how your body handles gluten.
Wheat isn’t just a problem for people with celiac disease, and there’s more to wheat than gluten.
2. Gut Inflammation
Inflammation is the natural response of your immune system to injury
. You can see it in action whenever you get a cut or splinter and the surrounding area gets all red and tender. The proteins in wheat are gut irritants: they’re like that papercut or splinter digging into the lining of your gut, causing an inflammatory response.
The most famous case is the inflammation caused by gluten in people with celiac disease or non-celiac gluten sensitivity. But
inflammation from wheat is also a problem even for people who aren’t sensitive to gluten specifically. Amylase trypsin inhibitors (ATIs for short) that can provoke an inflammatory immune response in the GI tract by stimulating immune cells.
This occurs in people regardless of whether they have celiac disease or
not – it’s a completely different problem from gluten and it can cause
trouble for you regardless of whether or not you’re sensitive to gluten
in particular.
That inflammation is dangerous because…
3. Increased Intestinal Permeability
Inflammation in the gut contributes to a problem called intestinal permeability.
The gut has a very complex system of “border control” that lets
digested food into your bloodstream (this is how you get nutrients from
it) while keeping everything else out. Every day, you swallow millions
of random viruses, bacteria, indigestible molecules like dust, and other
stuff that needs to go out the other end, not into your bloodstream.
Inflammation in the gut messes up that system of border control. It
loosens the junctions between cells in the gut wall so too much stuff
can pass through. This is often described as making the gut “leaky”
(hence the popular name of “leaky gut”).
On top of inflammation leading to increased permeability, gluten
accelerates this process by stimulating the release of a protein called
zonulin. Zonulin
independently contributes to loosening the junctions between cells in
the gut. Add together the inflammation and the zonulin, and wheat has a
powerful effect on gut permeability, which is really a problem.
Intestinal permeability is a big problem – most notably because it’s an essential factor in the development of autoimmune diseases.
4. Double Trouble: Wheat Germ Agglutinin
Another one for the non-Celiac crowd: wheat germ agglutinin is an inflammatory, immune-disrupting protein found in wheat
and despite the similar name it isn’t the same thing as gluten. Wheat
germ agglutinin can provoke an inflammatory response in gut cells and
disturb the natural immune barrier in the gut, making the gut more
permeable to things that don’t belong in your blood.
Again, this is totally separate from the problem of gluten.
Obviously, gluten and WGA usually come as a package deal, because
they’re both found in wheat, but you can have trouble with WGA even if
you had no reaction to a gluten elimination challenge.
5. Increased Vulnerability to Gut Autoimmunity
Items #1-4 on this list discussed how wheat makes the gut more
permeable, so all kinds of stuff can get into the bloodstream even
though it shouldn’t be there. Included in that stuff is…gluten!
Specifically, gliadin, which is a component of gluten. Once it’s inside
your bloodstream, gliadin runs into your immune system, and that’s where
the problems really start, in the form of molecular mimicry.
Molecular mimicry
works like this: some foreign thing gets into the bloodstream. The
immune system forms antibodies against it. So far, so good: that’s how
the immune system is supposed to work. But if that foreign thing looks
enough like your own body’s tissue, then the antibodies formed to fight
it might start attacking your own body as well.
Molecular mimicry may be the reason why people with celiac disease mount an attack on their own gut cells:
to your immune system, gliadin looks a lot like the cells lining the
gut. But it’s not just celiac disease! Gluten-related inflammation may also be a factor in the development of Crohn’s Disease, another autoimmune gut disease. In this study of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn’s Disease and ulcerative colitis), a gluten-free diet helped a majority of people who tried it.
And gut cells aren’t the only cells affected by gluten-related autoimmunity…
6. Increased Vulnerability to non-Celiac Autoimmune Diseases
If you go digging into the research on celiac disease and gluten,
you’ll find a bunch of studies linking it to all kinds of other
autoimmune diseases, including autoimmune thyroid disorders, type 1 diabetes, fibromyalgia (for both celiac disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity!), rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune liver disease, and a couple different autoimmune skin diseases.
The common factor here might be the gluten. Wheat gluten is a major potential trigger of Type 1 Diabetes (that’s the autoimmune type, not the diet-and-lifestyle type). In this study,
feeding mice a gluten-free diet reduced the rate of Type 1 diabetes in
their children. There’s also evidence that breastfeeding human children
reduces the rate of type 1 diabetes, which would make sense if gluten is
the problem because breastfeeding delays the introduction of gluten to
the baby.
Hey, by the way, guess what other common health problems have an autoimmune component? Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes.
7. Autoimmune Reactions in People Without Celiac Disease.
Point #6 above gave a lot of reasons why celiac disease is associated
with other autoimmune diseases, but it’s not limited to people with
celiac disease. If you thought non-celiac gluten sensitivity was
unrelated to autoimmune disease, you thought wrong! This study found
that a lot of people with non-celiac gluten sensitivity have autoimmune markers in their blood, suggesting that the wheat exposure might be causing autoimmune issues even without celiac disease.
One interesting aspect of this is that patients with non-celiac gluten sensitivity may have a different type of autoimmune reaction,
which just underlines that celiac disease and non-celiac gluten
sensitivity are two different things. But the point is that both involve
potentially serious autoimmune responses.
8. Damage to the Gut Biome
Not the all-important gut biome! The gut biome, aka the gut microbiome, aka the gut flora, is the collection of friendly bacteria that live in your
gut. They help regulate your immune system, control intestinal
permeability, digest your food, synthesize nutrients like vitamin K2,
send hunger/fullness signals to your brain, and do all kinds of other
stuff.
But they really don’t like gluten, and gluten really doesn’t like
them. People with celiac disease often have very bad problems with the
gut flora, but those problems are significantly reduced when the person eliminates gluten. Once again, it’s not limited to celiac disease: non-celiac gluten sensitivity also involves disturbances in the gut flora.
Even in people who aren’t sensitive to gluten at all, inflammation
caused by other components of wheat can also rebound on the gut biome.
And independently of any of that, wheat is also high in FODMAPs, which may be an issue for people with sensitivities to that.
9. Gastrointestinal Symptoms (Even for People who Don’t have Celiac Disease)
All this stuff about gut bacteria and intestinal permeability might
seem totally abstract and disconnected from the real world, so let’s
bring it back down to earth: this stuff has actual, noticeable
consequences. Most of the direct damage involves the gut, so it makes
sense to start there:
- In people with celiac disease, gluten causes immediate and severe symptoms (diarrhea and/or constipation, heartburn, pain, bloating, gas, stools that smell awful, sometimes vomiting…).
- In people with non-celiac gluten sensitivity, symptoms are typically similar to celiac disease.
- Even in people who aren’t sensitive to gluten specifically, the
inflammatory action of other components of wheat (wheat germ agglutinin
and amylase trypsin inhibitors) contributes to chronic, relapsing gut problems.
Of course, there are non-wheat-related reasons why a person might
have GI problems (stress is a biggie, and stress is certifiably
gluten-free). But gluten can contribute to the problem, even if it’s
“only” a low-level inflammatory response that you’ve gotten used to.
Sure, constipation and feeling bloated after meals might be your
“normal,” but what if it didn’t have to be?
10. Brain Symptoms
Think of gluten or wheat issues, and you probably think of the gut
first. The typical symptoms are all gut-related. But actually, there’s
another important organ at stake: your brain.
Brain fog
and
fatigue are symptoms of both celiac disease and non-celiac gluten
sensitivity. On a more serious note, the gut inflammation and microbiome
disturbances involved in the immune-inflammatory response to gluten may increase vulnerability to dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Autoimmunity in general (whether it’s celiac disease or some other gluten-related autoimmunity) may be involved in depression.
This doesn’t mean that gluten is the cause of all mental health
problems or that eliminating gluten will cure them. Nobody is saying
that. Mental health is complicated and there are all kinds of factors to
consider. The point is that in some people, gluten may be one of them.
11. Skin Symptoms
The most famous cause of gluten-related skin problems is celiac disease, which can cause a skin disease called dermatitis herpetiformis.
Symptoms of dermatitis herpetiformis include an itchy, red rash with
raised blisters. Symptoms typically show up in a person’s 20’s.
And once again, this isn’t limited to celiac disease. This study
describes the way non-celiac gluten sensitivity can show up as skin
problems: “very itchy…similar to eczema, psoriasis, or dermatitis
herpetiformis.” The itchy skin showed up most often on the arms and
legs.
The upshot: wheat is pretty bad news even for people who don’t have
celiac disease. And the symptoms don’t necessarily show up as dramatic
episodes of vomiting and diarrhea. Why not try giving it up for a few
weeks just to see how your body reacts – you might be surprised!
Wheat
is one of the most consumed cereal grains worldwide and makes up a
substantial part of the human diet. Although government-supported
dietary guidelines in Europe and the U.S.A advise individuals to eat
adequate amounts of (whole) grain products per day, cereal grains
contain “anti-nutrients,” such as wheat gluten and wheat lectin, that in
humans can elicit dysfunction and disease. In this review we discuss
evidence from in vitro, in vivo and human intervention
studies that describe how the consumption of wheat, but also other
cereal grains, can contribute to the manifestation of chronic
inflammation and autoimmune diseases by increasing intestinal
permeability and initiating a pro-inflammatory immune response.
Keywords: cereal grains, celiac disease, gluten, gliadin, inflammation, intestinal permeability, lectins, wheat, wheat germ agglutinin
Go to:
1. Introduction
Inflammation
is the response of the innate immune system triggered by noxious
stimuli, microbial pathogens and injury. When a trigger remains, or when
immune cells are continuously activated, an inflammatory response may
become self-sustainable and chronic. Chronic inflammation has been
associated with many medical and psychiatric disorders, including
cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, cancer, autoimmune diseases,
schizophrenia and depression [
1,
2,
3].
Furthermore, it is usually associated with elevated levels of
pro-inflammatory cytokines and acute phase proteins, such as interferons
(IFNs), interleukin (Il)-1, Il-6, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and
C-reactive protein (CRP). While clear peripheral sources for this
chronic inflammation are apparent in some conditions (
i.e., fat
production of cytokines in the metabolic syndrome), in other disorders,
such as major depression, the inflammatory source is not completely
understood. Genetic vulnerability, psychological stress and poor dietary
patterns have all been repeatedly implicated as being of significant
importance in the development of an inflammatory phenotype [
3,
4,
5]. Dietary factors associated with inflammation include a shift towards a higher
n-6:
n-3 fatty acid ratio [
5] and a high intake of simple sugars [
6].
Other substances in our daily food, like those found in wheat and other
cereal grains, are also capable of activating pro-inflammatory
pathways.
Go to:
2. Wheat Grain, Gluten and Disease
2.1. Wheat Allergy and Intolerance
The
ingestion of wheat products has been reported to be responsible for
IgE-mediated allergic reactions. Wheat-dependent exercise-induced
anaphylaxis is a syndrome in which the ingestion of a product containing
wheat followed by physical exercise can result in an anaphylactic
response. Several proteins present in wheat, most notably gluten
proteins have been shown to react with IgE in patients [
7].
Other allergic responses that appear to be related to a range of wheat
proteins include baker’s asthma, rhinitis and contact urticaria [
7,
8].
More
common than wheat allergies are conditions involving wheat intolerance,
including celiac disease (CD), which is estimated to affect 1% of the
population of Western Europe, and dermatitis herpetiformis, which has an
incidence between about 2-fold and 5-fold lower than CD [
9]. The close association between type 1 diabetes and CD [
10] and the observation that autoimmune diseases seem to be more prevalent in celiac patients and their relatives [
11] thus links the intake of wheat with several other conditions.
2.2. Wheat Grain and Gluten
Gluten
is the main structural protein complex of wheat consisting of glutenins
and gliadins. When wheat flour is mixed with water to form dough, the
gluten proteins form a continuous network which provides the
cohesiveness and viscoelasticity that allows dough to be processed into
bread, noodles and other foods. The protein contents of wheat varies
between 7% and 22% with gluten constituting about 80% of the total
protein of the seed [
9].
Glutenins are the fraction of wheat proteins that are soluble in dilute
acids and are polymers of individual proteins. Prolamins are the
alcohol-soluble proteins of cereal grains and are specifically named
gliadins in wheat. Gliadins are monomeric proteins and are classified
into three groups: α/β-gliadins, γ-gliadins, and ω-gliadins [
7].
2.3. Gluten, Gliadin and CD
Gliadin
epitopes from wheat gluten and related prolamins from other
gluten-containing cereal grains, including rye and barley, can trigger
CD in genetically susceptible people. The symptoms of this disease are
mucosal inflammation, small intestine villous atrophy, increased
intestinal permeability and malabsorption of macro- and micronutrients.
CD, a chronic inflammatory disorder mediated by T-cells, is preceded by
changes in intestinal permeability and pro-inflammatory activity of the
innate immune system. Gliadin immunomodulatory peptides can be
recognized by specific T-cells, a process that can be enhanced by the
deamidation of gliadin epitopes by tissue transglutaminases that convert
particular glutamine residues into glutamic acid resulting in a higher
affinity for HLA-DQ2 or DQ8 expressed on antigen-presenting cells (APC) [
10].
Serum antibodies, among which are antibodies against tissue
transglutaminases, are also found in CD. The HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8 is
expressed in 99.4% of the patients suffering from CD [
10],
however, interestingly enough, there is a group of HLA-DQ2/DQ8-negative
patients suffering from gastrointestinal symptoms that respond well to a
gluten-free diet. This group of “gluten-sensitive” patients does not
have the CD serology and histopathology, but does present the same
symptoms and shows improvements when following a gluten-free diet [
12,
13].
2.4. Gliadin and Immunity
There
are at least 50 gliadin epitopes that exert immunomodulatory, cytotoxic
and gut-permeating activities that can be partially traced back to
different domains of α-gliadin. Where some immunomodulatory gliadin
peptides activate specific T-cells, others are able to induce a
pro-inflammatory innate immune response [
10].
Stimulation of immune cells by gliadin is not only restricted to CD
patients; the incubation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC)
from healthy HLA-DQ2-positive controls and CD patients with gliadin
peptides stimulated the production of IL-23, IL-1β and TNF-α in all
donors tested. Nevertheless, the production of cytokines was
significantly higher in PBMC derived from CD patients [
14]. Similar results were obtained by Lammers
et al. [
15],
who demonstrated that gliadin induced an inflammatory immune response
in both CD patients and healthy controls, though IL-6, Il-13 and IFN-γ
were expressed at significantly higher levels in CD patients. IL-8
production was only expressed in a subset of healthy and CD individuals
after stimulation with a specific gliadin peptide and appeared to
dependent on the CXCR3 chemokine receptor only in CD patients. Sapone
et al. [
16]
showed that in a subset of CD patients, but not in gluten-sensitive
patients (with 36% of the studied individuals in this group being
HLA-DQ2/DQ8-positive), there is an increased IL-17 mRNA expression in
the small-intestinal mucosa compared to healthy controls. The same group
showed that in a subset of gluten-sensitive patients (with about 50% of
the studied individuals being HLA-DQ2/DQ8-positive) there is a
prevailing stimulation of the innate immune system, while in CD, both
the innate and adaptive immune system are involved [
13].
2.5. Gliadin and Intestinal Permeability
In
order for gliadin to interact with cells of the immune system, it has
to overcome the intestinal barrier. Gliadin peptides cross the
epithelial layer by transcytosis or paracellular transport. Paracellular
transport occurs when intestinal permeability is increased, a feature
that is characteristic for CD [
17].
It is indicated by several studies that increased intestinal
permeability precedes the onset of CD and is not just a consequence of
chronic intestinal inflammation [
18,
19].
Gliadin has been demonstrated to increase permeability in human Caco-2
intestinal epithelial cells by reorganizing actin filaments and altering
expression of junctional complex proteins [
20]. Several studies by Fasano
et al.
show that the binding of gliadin to the chemokine receptor CXCR3 on
epithelial IEC-6 and Caco2 cells releases zonulin, a protein that
directly compromises the integrity of the junctional complex [
21,
22].
Although zonulin levels were more up-regulated in CD patients, zonulin
was activated by gliadin in intestinal biopsies from both CD and non-CD
patients [
21,
22],
suggesting that gliadin can increase intestinal permeability also in
non-CD patients, yet increased intestinal permeability was not observed
in a group of gluten-sensitive patients [
13].
Go to:
3. Increased Intestinal Permeability
3.1. Increased Intestinal Permeability is Associated with Disease
Chronically
increased intestinal permeability (or leaky gut syndrome) allows for
the increased translocation of both microbial and dietary antigens to
the periphery which can then interact with cells of the immune system.
Shared amino acid motifs among exogenous peptides (HLA-derived peptides
and self-tissue) may produce cross-reactivity through immunological
mimicry, thereby disturbing immune tolerance in genetically susceptible
individuals [
23]. Not surprisingly, increased intestinal permeability has been associated with autoimmune diseases, such as type 1 diabetes [
24], rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis [
18], but also with diseases related to chronic inflammation like inflammatory bowel disease [
18,
25], asthma [
26],
chronic fatigue syndrome and depression. The latter two conditions see
patients with significantly greater values of serum IgA and IgM to LPS
of gram-negative enterobacteria compared to controls, implying
intestinal permeability is increased in these patients [
27,
28,
29].
3.2. Intestinal Barrier Function and Inflammation
The
intestinal barrier allows the uptake of nutrients and protects from
damage of harmful substances from the gut lumen. Macromolecules that can
be immunogenic like proteins, large peptides, but also bacteria and
lectins, can be endocytosed or phagocytosed by enterocytes forming the
epithelial layer of the gut. Absorbed proteins will generally enter the
lysosomal route and will be degraded to small peptides. Normally, only
small amounts of antigen pass the barrier by transcytosis and interact
with the innate and adaptive immune system situated in the lamina
propria. Highly specialized epithelial microfold (M) cells function as
active transporters of dietary and microbial antigens from the gut lumen
to the immune system, where either a pro-inflammatory or tolerogenic
immune response can be generated. The paracellular route is regulated by
the junctional complex that allows the passage of water, solutes and
ions, but under normal conditions provides a barrier to larger peptides
and protein-sized molecules. When the barrier function is disrupted,
there is an increased passage of dietary and microbial antigens
interacting with cells of the immune system [
25,
30] ().
Figure 1
Increased
intestinal permeability allows for the passage of microbial and dietary
antigens across the epithelial layer into the lamina propria, where
these antigens can be taken up by APC and presented to T-cells. JC,
junctional complex.
3.3. The Role of Zonulin Signaling on Intestinal Permeability
Intestinal
permeability is a measure of the barrier function of the gut which
relates to the paracellular space surrounding the brush border surface
of the enterocytes and the junctional complexes consisting of tight
junctions, adherent junctions, desmosomes and gap junctions [
31].
The junctional complexes are regulated in response to physiological and
immunological stimuli, like stress, cytokines, dietary antigens and
microbial products [
31].
As mentioned before, zonulin, a protein identified as
prehaptoglobulin-2 (the precursor of haptoglobin-2) is also a regulator
of intestinal permeability. Haptoglobin-2, together with haptoglobin-1,
is one of the two gene variants of the multifunctional protein
haptoglobin and is associated with an increased risk for CD (homozygotes
and heterozygotes) and severe malabsorption (homozygotes) [
32,
33].
The haptoglobulin-2/zonulin allele has a frequency of about 0.6 in
Europe and the U.S.A, but varies throughout the world depending on
racial origin [
34].
3.4. High Zonulin Levels are Observed in Auto-Immune and Inflammatory Diseases
Zonulin
signaling is proposed to cause rearrangements of actin filaments and
induces the displacement of proteins from the junctional complex,
thereby increasing permeability [
18,
32,
35].
Gliadin peptides initiate intestinal permeability through the release
of zonulin, thereby enabling paracellular translocation of gliadin and
other dietary and microbial antigens, which by interacting with the
immune system give rise to inflammation. In this manner, a vicious cycle
is created in which, as a consequence of the persistent presence of
pro-inflammatory mediators, intestinal permeability will increase even
further. High zonulin levels (together with increased intestinal
permeability) have been observed in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases
like CD, multiple sclerosis, asthma and inflammatory bowel disease and
the haptoglobin polymorphism is associated with rheumatoid arthritis,
ankylosing spondylitis, schizophrenia and certain types of cancer [
32].
The
zonulin inhibitor Larozotide acetate was tested in an inpatient,
double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. The group of CD
patients in the placebo group that were exposed to gluten showed a 70%
increase in intestinal permeability, while no changes were seen in the
group exposed to Larazotide acetate. Also gastrointestinal symptoms were
significantly more frequent in the placebo group [
32].
These results suggest that in CD patients, when intestinal barrier
function is restored, autoimmunity will disappear while the trigger
(gluten) is still there. Besides gliadin from wheat gluten, the lectin
wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) has also been shown to stimulate cells of
the immune system and increase intestinal permeability, as we will now
discuss further.
Go to:
4. Wheat Germ Agglutinin (WGA)
4.1. Dietary WGA
Lectins
are present in a variety of plants, especially in seeds, where they
serve as defense mechanisms against other plants and fungi. Because of
their ability to bind to virtually all cell types and cause damage to
several organs, lectins are widely recognized as anti-nutrients within
food [
36]. Most lectins are resistant to heat and the effects of digestive enzymes, and are able to bind to several tissues and organs
in vitro and
in vivo (reviewed by Freed 1991 [
37]).
The administration of the lectin WGA to experimental animals caused
hyperplastic and hypertrophic growth of the small intestine,
hypertrophic growth of the pancreas and thymus atrophy [
36].
Lectin activity has been demonstrated in wheat, rye, barley, oats, corn
and rice, however the best studied of the cereal grain lectins is WGA [
38].
The highest WGA concentrations are found in wheat germ (up to 0.5 g/kg [
39]).
Although unprocessed wheat germ, like muesli, contains far higher
amounts of active WGA than do processed wheat germ products, WGA
activity is still apparent in several processed breakfast cereals as
assessed by hemagglutination and bacterial agglutination assays [
40,
41]. A summary of the amount of active WGA in commonly consumed wheat derived products is listed in .
Table 1
Amount of active WGA in wheat-derived products.
4.2. WGA Binds to Cell Surface Glycoconjugates
WGA binds to
N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac), the sialic acid predominantly found in humans [
44],
allowing it to adhere to cell surfaces like the epithelial layer of the
gut. The surface of many prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells are covered
with a dense coating of glycoconjugates, also named glycocalyx. Sialic
acids are a wide family of nine-carbon sugars that are typically found
at the terminal positions of many surface-exposed glycoconjugates and
function for self recognition in the vertebrate immune system, but they
can also be used as a binding target for pathogenic extrinsic receptors
and molecular toxins [
45,
46,
47].
WGA binding to Neu5Ac of the glycocalyx of human cells (and pathogens
expressing Neu5Ac) allows for cell entry and could disturb immune
tolerance by evoking a pro-inflammatory immune response (discussed
below).
4.3. WGA and Immunity
WGA
induces inflammatory responses by immune cells. For example, WGA has
been shown to trigger histamine secretion and granule extrusion from
non-stimulated rat peritoneal mast cells [
48], induce NADP-oxidase activity in human neutrophils [
49] and stimulate the release of the cytokines IL-4 and IL-13 from human basophils [
50].
In human PBMC, WGA induced the production of IL-2, while simultaneously
inhibiting the proliferation of activated lymphocytes [
51].
WGA stimulated the secretion of IL-12, in a T- and B-cell-independent
manner in murine spleen cells. IL-12, in turn, activated the secretion
of IFN-γ by T or natural killer cells [
52]. In murine peritoneal macrophages WGA induced the production of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-12 and IFN-γ [
53].
Similar results have been observed in isolated human PBMC, given that
nanomolar concentrations of WGA stimulated the release of several
pro-inflammatory cytokines. In the same study a significant increase in
the intracellular accumulation of IL-1β was measured in monocytes after
WGA exposure [
54]. These results indicate that, when delivered
in vitro,
WGA is capable of directly stimulating monocytes and macrophages, cells
that have the ability to initiate and maintain inflammatory responses.
Monocytic cells have been shown to engulf WGA via receptor-mediated
endocytosis or by binding to non-receptor glycoproteins [
55].
Human
data showing the influence of WGA intake on inflammatory markers are
lacking, however, antibodies to WGA have been detected in the serum of
healthy individuals [
56].
Significantly higher antibody levels to WGA were measured in patients
with CD compared to patients with other intestinal disorders. These
antibodies did not cross-react with gluten antigens and could therefore
play an important role in the pathogenesis of this disease [
57].
4.4. WGA and Intestinal Permeability
After
ingestion, WGA is capable of crossing the intestinal barrier. In animal
models, WGA has been shown to reach the basolateral membrane and walls
of the small blood vessels in the subepithelium of the small intestine [
36]. WGA can be phagocytosed by binding to membrane non-receptor glycoproteins, a process that has been observed in Caco-2 cells [
58]. WGA can also be endocytosed by antigen sampling M-cells [
59,
60] or by enterocytes via binding to epidermal growth factor receptors [
61].
Another possible route for lectin entry into the periphery is by
paracellular transport, a process that can be further aggravated by the
binding of gliadin to the chemokine receptor CXR3 on enterocytes.
WGA itself has been found to affect enterocyte permeability. Investigations by Dalla Pellegrina
et al. [
54] showed,
in vitro,
that exposure to micromolar concentrations of WGA impairs the integrity
of the intestinal epithelial layer, allowing passage of small
molecules, like lectins. At the basolateral side of the epithelium, WGA
concentrations in the nanomolar range induced the secretion of
pro-inflammatory cytokines by immune cells [
54].
This may further affect the integrity of the epithelial layer,
heightening the potential for a positive feedback loop between WGA,
epithelial cells and immune cells. When combined, these mechanisms are
likely able to significantly increase the percentage of consumed WGA
that can cross the epithelial layer compared to the low percentage of
WGA crossing by means of transcytosis (0.1%) alone [
54].
This suggests that, together with gliadin, WGA can increase intestinal
permeability, resulting in an increase of translocating microbial and
dietary antigens interacting with cells of the immune system.
Go to:
5. Animal Data on Cereal Grain Intake
There
are two rodent models of spontaneous type 1 diabetes: the
non-obese-diabetic (NOD) mouse and the diabetes-prone BioBreeding (BBdp)
rat. In these animals, a cereal-based diet containing wheat induced the
development of type 1 diabetes, while animals fed a hypoallergenic diet
(gluten free) or a hypoallergenic diet supplemented with casein showed a
decreased incidence and a delayed onset of this disease. BBdp rats fed a
cereal-based diet showed increased intestinal permeability and a
significant increase in the percentage of IFN-γ-producing Th1
lymphocytes in the mesenteric lymph nodes in the gut [
30].
Compared to animals fed a hypoallergenic diet, NOD mice fed a
wheat-based diet expressed higher mRNA levels of the pro-inflammatory
cytokines IFN-γ and TNF-α and the inflammatory marker inducible NO
synthase in the small intestine. While these diet-induced changes in
gut-wall inflammatory activity did not translate to increased cytokine
mRNA in Peyers patches, structures that contribute to immune regulation
to exogenous antigens, it is possible that the gut-signal may promote
systemic inflammation via other mechanisms, such as activating
intraepithelial lymphocytes and mesenteric lymph node cells [
62]. These
in vivo
results show that, in two rodent models of spontaneous type 1 diabetes,
a cereal-containing diet induces the (early) onset of disease and
increases markers of inflammation. In addition, Chignola
et al. [
63]
have shown in rats that a WGA-depleted diet was associated with reduced
responsiveness of lymphocytes from primary and secondary lymphoid
organs after
in vitro stimulation and attenuated spontaneous
proliferation when compared to lymphocytes from rats fed a
WGA-containing diet, indicating the stimulatory effect of WGA on cells
of the immune system.
Go to:
6. Human Studies on Cereal Grain Intake and Inflammation
6.1. Human Epidemiological Data on Cereal Grain Intake and Inflammation
Observational
prospective and cross-sectional studies show that the intake of whole
grain products is associated with reduced risks for developing type 2
diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, obesity and some types of cancer [
64].
Inflammation is associated with these conditions and some studies have
shown that associations between the intake of whole grains and decreased
inflammatory markers (CRP, Il-6) are found [
65]. Intervention studies, however, do not demonstrate a clear effect of the intake of whole grains on inflammation [
66,
67,
68,
69,
70,
71] and it could therefore be that other components in the diet modulate the immune response.
It
has been shown that the intake of whole grains is associated with
healthier dietary factors and a healthier lifestyle in general. In a
Scandinavian cross-sectional study, the intake of whole grains was
directly associated with the length of education, the intake of
vegetables, fruits, dairy products, fish, shellfish, coffee, tea and
margarine and inversely associated with smoking, BMI and the intake of
red meat, white bread, alcohol, cakes and biscuits [
72].
Good quality epidemiological studies attempt to control these
confounding factors, but with the consequence that associations are
attenuated or become insignificant.
6.2. Human Intervention Trials on Cereal Grain Intake and Inflammation
To
accurately estimate the causal relationship of cereal grain intake and
inflammation, intervention trials provide us with better evidence.
Wolever
et al. [
71]
showed that a diet with a low glycemic index (containing whole grains)
compared to high (containing refined grain products), resulted in
sustained reductions in postprandial glucose and CRP levels on the
long-term in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with diet alone. A
refined grain is a whole grain that has been stripped of its outer shell
(fiber) and its germ, leaving only the endosperm, resulting in lower
levels of macro- and micronutrients and a higher dietary glycemic index
for refined grains compared to whole grains. Refined wheat products
contain less WGA, but still contain a substantial amount of gluten. It
should be noted that whole grains contain phytochemicals, like
polyphenols, that can exert anti-inflammatory effects which could
possibly offset any potentially pro-inflammatory effects of gluten and
lectins [
73].
The
substitution of whole grain (mainly based on milled wheat) for refined
grains products in the daily diet of healthy moderately overweight
adults for six weeks did not affect insulin sensitivity or markers of
lipid peroxidation and inflammation [
66]. Consistent with these finding are the results of Brownlee
et al. [
67],
who showed that infrequent whole-grain consumers, when increasing whole
grain consumption (including whole wheat products), responded with no
improvements of the studied biomarkers of cardiovascular health,
including insulin sensitivity, plasma lipid profile and markers of
inflammation. The substitution of refined cereal grains and white bread
with three portions of whole wheat food or one portion of whole wheat
food combined with two servings of oats significantly decreased the
systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure in middle-aged, healthy,
overweight men and women, yet none of the interventions significantly
affected systemic markers of inflammation [
70].
In obese adults suffering from metabolic syndrome, there were
significantly greater decreases in CRP and the percentage of body fat in
the abdominal region in participants consuming whole grains compared to
those consuming refined grains. It must be noted that both diets were
hypocaloric (reduced by 500 kcal/d) [
69].
Most of the intervention studies mentioned above attempted to increase
whole grain intake and were using refined grain diets as controls,
thereby making it very difficult to draw any conclusions on the
independent role of cereal grains in disease and inflammation.
6.3. Health Effects of the Paleolithic Diet
There
are few studies that investigate the influence of a paleolithic type
diet comprising lean meat, fruits, vegetables and nuts, and excluding
food types, such as dairy, legumes and cereal grains, on health. In
domestic pigs, the paleolithic diet conferred higher insulin
sensitivity, lower CRP and lower blood pressure when compared to a
cereal-based diet [
74].
In healthy sedentary humans, the short-term consumption of a
paleolithic type diet improved blood pressure and glucose tolerance,
decreased insulin secretion, increased insulin sensitivity and improved
lipid profiles [
75].
Glucose tolerance also improved in patients suffering from a
combination of ischemic heart disease and either glucose intolerance or
type 2 diabetes and who had been advised to follow a paleolithic diet.
Control subjects who were advised to follow a Mediterranean-like diet
based on whole grains, low-fat dairy products, fish, fruits and
vegetables did not significantly improve their glucose tolerance despite
decreases in weight and waist circumference [
76].
Similar positive results on glycemic control were obtained in diabetic
patients when the paleolithic diet was compared with the diabetes diet.
Participants were on each diet for three months, whereby the paleolithic
diet resulted in a lower BMI, weight and waist circumference, higher
mean HDL, lower mean levels of hemoglobin A1c, triacylglycerol and
diastolic blood pressure, though levels of CRP were not significantly
different [
77].
Although the paleolithic diet studies are small, these results suggest
that, together with other dietary changes, the withdrawal of cereal
grains from the diet has a positive effect on health. Nevertheless,
because these studies are confounded by the presence or absence of other
dietary substances and by differences in energy and macronutrient
intake, factors that could all affect markers of inflammation, it is
difficult to make a concise statement on the impact of cereal grains on
these health outcomes.
6.4. Rechallenge Trial of Effects of Dietary Gluten
One human intervention study specifically focused on the effects of dietary gluten on inflammation. Biesiekierski
et al. [
12]
undertook a double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled rechallenge
trial to investigate the influence of gluten in individuals with
irritable bowel syndrome but without clinical features of CD, who
reached satisfactory levels of symptom control with a gluten-free diet.
After screening the participants, about 50% of the individuals in both
the gluten and placebo group were HLA-DQ2 and/or HLA-DQ8 positive.
Participants received either gluten or placebo together with a
gluten-free diet for six weeks. Endpoints in the study were symptom
assessments and biomarkers of inflammation and intestinal permeability.
The patients receiving gluten reported significantly more symptoms
compared to the placebo group. The most striking outcome of this study
was that for all the endpoints measured, there were no differences in
individuals with or without HLA-DQ2/DQ8, indicating that the intake of
gluten can cause symptoms also in individuals without this specific
HLA-profile. No differences in biomarkers for inflammation and
intestinal permeability were found between both groups, however,
inflammatory mediators have been implicated in the development of
symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome [
78].
It could therefore be inferred that the markers used to measure
inflammation and intestinal permeability were not sensitive enough to
detect subtle changes on the tissue level.
No comments:
Post a Comment