Mental disorders in foster children
The
aim of this study is to examine the prevalence of mental disorders in
6- to 12-year-old foster children and assess comorbidity and risk
factors.
Methods
Information on mental health was
collected from foster parents and from teachers using Developmental and
Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA) Web-based diagnostic interview. Child
welfare services provided information about care conditions prior to
placement and about the child’s placement history.
Results
Diagnostic information was obtained
about 279 (70.5%) of 396 eligible foster children. In total, 50.9% of
the children met the criteria for one or more DSM-IV disorders. The most
common disorders were grouped into 3 main diagnostic groups: Emotional
disorders (24.0%), ADHD (19.0%), and Behavioural disorders (21.5%). The
comorbidity rates among these 3 main groups were high: 30.4% had
disorders in 2 of these 3 diagnostic groups, and 13.0% had disorders in
all 3 groups. In addition, Reactive attachment disorder (RAD) was
diagnosed in 19.4% of the children, of whom 58.5% had comorbid disorders
in the main diagnostic groups. Exposure to violence, serious neglect,
and the number of prior placements increased the risk for mental
disorders.
Conclusions
Foster children in Norway have a high
prevalence of mental disorders, compared to the general child population
in Norway and to other societies. The finding that 1 in 2 foster
children presented with a mental disorder with high rates of comorbidity
highlight the need for skilled assessment and qualified service
provision for foster children and families.
Background
In Western societies, the number of children placed out of home converged at approximately 5 per 1000 in 2006-2007 [1]. In Norway [2], as in most western societies [3],
parental neglect endangering a child’s development and health is the
primary reason for out-of-home placement, and families receiving
services from the child welfare system are often characterised by low
socioeconomic status [4].
Child welfare services in Norway are typically family-oriented,
emphasising voluntary and preventive home-based interventions. After a
family’s first contact with child welfare services, children continue to
stay, on average, 3 years with their biological families receiving
home-based services, before they are placed out of home [5].
However, once the child has been placed in a foster family, the
placements tend to last longer than in Anglo-American countries [3].
The
prevalence of mental health problems in foster children has primarily
been investigated using symptom checklists, providing an overall
estimated prevalence of mental health problems in the range of 42.7% to
61.0% [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11].
Because questionnaires do not allow for detailed enquiry into symptom
patterns, duration, or functional impact, these estimates may not be
equated with estimates based on diagnostic assessments. Furthermore,
symptom checklists do not take into account comorbidity rates.
Standardised
diagnostic interviews are seen as the best way to achieve reliable
prevalence estimates for mental disorders in different populations.
However, only a few studies so far have used such diagnostic interviews
to estimate the prevalence of mental disorders among foster children.
One early study reported a point-prevalence of DSM-III-R disorders of
57.0% in foster youth [12]. A rather similar overall prevalence rate of 50,0% has been found in a more recent study of foster youth aged 11-17 years. [13] McMillen et al. [14]
reported a somewhat lower past-year prevalence of 33.0% in a comparable
sample, with 17.0% having Conduct Disorders (CD) or Oppositional
Defiant Disorder (ODD), 15.0% Major depression, and 10.0% Attention
Deficit Hyperactive Disorder (ADHD). Consistent with other studies, [12, 15, 16] the prevalence was higher for youths placed in congregate care [14]. In a study of foster youths aged 17 years and older, Keller, Salazar and Courtney [15]
reported a lifetime prevalence of DSM-IV disorders of 10.5% for Major
Depression and 16.1% post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
These
interview-based diagnostic studies all assessed older foster youths,
using self-report only. The only sample that included younger foster
children was the study by Ford, Vosansis, Meltzer and Goodman [16].
They reported a point-prevalence of 38.6%, where 9.7% suffered from
Emotional disorders, 32.3% had CD/ODD and 8.5% had Hyperactivity. In
this study, the diagnostic information was obtained from teachers,
caregivers, and youths from 11 years of age. A higher prevalence rate
was found in boys than in girls, and the rates increased with age.
Whether this age-related increase could be attributed to later placement
and longer exposure to neglect and abuse was not explored. Furthermore,
the prevalence was only reported for broader diagnostic groups and not
for single disorders among children living in foster families.
In
contrast to the general agreement regarding the diagnostic criteria and
methods of assessment for most mental disorders in children, the
validity and relevance of the criteria for the diagnosis of Reactive
Attachment Disorder (RAD) have been more controversial, especially
regarding how these features should be characterised and assessed after
the age of 5 years old [17, 18].
Some longitudinal studies have continued to use the Strange Situation
Procedure up until school age, in combination with parental reports and
standardised investigator ratings of child behaviour [19, 20], while others have developed their own semi-structured interviews and rating scales [21].
Findings indicate that children exposed to early adverse childhood experiences in general [22] and more specifically children placed in foster care have a heightened risk of attachment difficulties [23, 24]. Further, attachment difficulties have been related to other mental health problems both among foster and adopted children [25, 26]. It is therefore important to include measures of attachment disorders when assessing mental disorders of foster children.
Recently,
a RAD section was added to the Developmental and Well-Being Assessment
(DAWBA) structured diagnostic interview manual [27], developed from the corresponding section of the Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Assessment interview [28].
The first study using the DAWBA-RAD section reported a very high RAD
point-prevalence of 63.0% (96/153) in a sample of looked after youth in a
variety of placement forms [29]. In this study however, RAD was not defined according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) [30]
criteria, but as a symptom score 2 standard deviations greater than the
mean. There is therefore a need for further studies of the prevalence
of RAD among school-aged children living in foster families, as this age
range and placement form are the most common in child protection
services.
Age, sex, and learning difficulties [31, 32], as well as low socioeconomic status [33, 34],
are well-established predictors of mental health problems in children
in general. Foster children are exposed to a range of other risk factors
as well [35].
Adverse childhood experiences, such as psychological and physical abuse
and neglect, parental substance abuse and mental illness, all increase
the risk of both physical and mental health problems, as well as health
risk behaviours [36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41].
In addition, older age at placement, frequent placement changes, the
number of placements and persistent adverse events after placement pose
additional risks for these children [42, 43].
However, few studies so far have examined whether such risk factors
show specific associations with certain types of mental disorders [44].
In
summary, previous studies have converged on the finding that foster
children represent a high-risk group for mental health problems and that
these problems might be associated with experiences of early neglect,
abuse, and other adverse childhood experiences. However, only a few
studies have used diagnostic interviews, covering the full range of
mental disorders, and only one of these studies included school-aged
foster children who were still living in foster families.
The
purpose of this study was to estimate the point-prevalence and
comorbidity of DSM-IV disorders in school-aged foster children. Further,
we aimed to investigate the predictive value and specificity of risk
factors related to adverse childhood experiences prior to placement, and
placement history with regard to mental disorders in these children.
Because
most foster children have been exposed to neglect and abuse before
placement, we expected them to show increased rates of mental disorders
compared to the general population [32].
We expected greater exposure to risk factors to be related to a higher
prevalence of mental disorders, and in line with existing research
findings, we expected that psychological and physical abuse, parental
substance abuse and mental illness in the family of origin would be
positively associated with mental disorders. Further, we expected to
find associations between the prevalence of mental disorders and an
unstable placement history.
Methods
Sample: eligibility and recruitment
The
inclusion criteria were children aged 6 to 12 years old, living in
foster families encompassed by the Southern Regional Office for
Children, Youth and Family Affairs for at least 5 months following
legally mandated placement. According to records from the Regional
Office for Children, Youth and Family Affairs, there were 391 eligible
children living in the 63 municipalities of the region.
Informational
letters were sent to the head of each municipal child welfare office.
The office heads were asked to review the list from the regional
register of foster children and to complete the list by adding eligible
children who were not registered. This process led to the identification
of 28 additional eligible children. Of the registered children, the
municipalities reported that 20 had either returned to their biological
families or had been adopted. Three additional children were deemed
ineligible because of serious neurological disabilities. Thus, the final
number of eligible children was 396. The child welfare offices in the
municipalities were asked to provide contact information for these
children’s schools and teachers. They were also asked to answer a short
purpose-made questionnaire about the children’s care conditions prior to
placement and their placement histories. The caseworkers did not
provide any diagnostic information, so the diagnoses are based on the
DAWBA from the foster parents and the child`s teacher.
Foster
parents of the 396 eligible children received postal letters with
detailed information about the study, as well as instructions on how to
complete the DAWBA interview online. They were also asked to return
contact information for the children’s schools and teachers. In total,
contact information was obtained for 307 teachers, who were then
contacted by postal mail and asked to complete a version of the DAWBA
diagnostic interview online. Figure 1 provides a flowchart of the entire data collection.
Ethics
The
study was approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health
Research Ethics, Western Norway. The Ministry of Children, Equality and
Integration provided exemptions from confidentiality for caseworkers,
foster parents, and teachers participating in this study. In accordance
with Norwegian ethics requirement, oral assent is required from children
aged 12 years old. The children and their foster parents were
instructed about this in the information letters that included a version
especially adapted for children. If the child did not assent, the
foster parents were instructed not to participate in the survey.
Measurements and diagnostic rating procedures
We used the Developmental and Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA) [27]
interview to assess DSM-IV mental disorders. The DAWBA is a Web-based
diagnostic interview that combines structured questions on symptoms and
impairment with open-ended questions in which the respondents describe
the child’s problems in their own words. The DAWBA administered to
parents or caregivers has a total of 17 sections, covering diagnostic
areas, child and family background, and child strengths. The time needed
to complete the interview by carers vary from 30 minutes to several
hours, depending on the amount of problems reported. Due to skip-rules
included in the web-based interview, the interview becomes shorter if no
problems are reported in the initial questions of a section. Teachers
respond to a shorter version of the interview, which typically can be
completed in 15-30 minutes.
The
task of the clinical rater is to judge the answers from the different
informants. For most disorders, the diagnostic criteria only require
that problems are evident in one setting (e.g. at home or at school).
The different informants are usually treated as complementary adding to
the understanding of the child. Where informants give contradictory
information, the rater has to use her judgment as to witch informant is
the most reliable. The DAWBA interview has shown good ability to
discriminate between children from community and clinical settings [27], and it has generated realistic prevalence estimates of mental disorders when used in public health services [32, 45].
In
this study, all of the available DAWBA information from both foster
parents and teachers were reviewed by first and last author, who
separately assigned diagnoses according to the DSM-IV criteria. Both
raters are clinical specialists in child and youth mental health. Last
author has documented high inter-rater agreement with Robert Goodman,
who developed the DAWBA [32].
The agreement between the 2 raters regarding the presence/absence of a
disorder was excellent (Kappa = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.88-1.00).
If
informants reported a definitive impairment in function but not
sufficient symptoms to fulfill a specific diagnosis, an “other” or NOS
diagnosis was given. A previously given ADHD diagnosis by a specialist
in child mental health services was accepted, even if the ADHD interview
section reported sub-threshold symptoms and impairment, because the
symptoms might have been suppressed by medication. For children from the
age of 11 years, the RAD section is not a part of the DAWBA interview.
For the children aged 11-12 years old, we therefore used free-text
description of symptoms and impairments meeting the DSM-IV criteria to
assess RAD. A previously given RAD diagnosis by a specialist in child
mental health services was also accepted for this age group.
A
short child welfare questionnaire was developed for the study to obtain
information from caseworkers in the child welfare services, about 12
possible care conditions in the biological family; the caseworker could
mark any number of these conditions, corresponding to their records of
characteristics of the child’s care experiences. The questionnaire also
asked about placement history and the country of birth of both the child
and biological parents.
Procedures
The
data collection started in September 2011 and lasted for 6 months. If
foster parents or teachers had not responded within 2 weeks after the
first information letter, a reminder was sent. Consenting foster parents
who still had not completed the DAWBA within 2 months were offered a
telephone interview. Thirty-one DAWBA interviews were completed over the
phone. Teachers were compensated with NOK 250 (31 Euro) for their
participation, while foster parents were not offered compensation for
participating.
Analysis
Statistical
analyses were performed with the Statistical Package for the Social
Sciences (SPSS), version 19 for Windows. Comparison between subsamples
was performed with t-tests
and Chi-square tests. The prevalence of disorders was calculated by
frequency analyses with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In subsequent
analysis, single disorders were clustered into 3 main diagnostic groups.
Due to the relatively low prevalence of depression, this disorder was
grouped together with all of the anxiety disorders and with
undifferentiated anxiety/depression in the main diagnostic group of
Emotional disorders (see Table 1).
Diagnoses related to ADHD were grouped into ADHD disorders. Similarly,
CD, ODD, and other disruptive disorders were grouped into the diagnostic
group of Behavioural disorders. This grouping of disorders corresponded
to that used in Ford et al.’s study of looked-after children [16].
Further, the RAD group comprised only that diagnosis. The group
labelled “Any disorders” comprised all single disorders referred to in
Table 1, except for the NOS diagnosis.
Table 1
Characteristics of foster children with both DAWBA and municipal care history information (n = 219)
%
|
Mean
|
SD
| |
---|---|---|---|
Age (years)
|
8.97
|
2.04
| |
Female gender
|
47.0
| ||
Former placements
|
0.90
|
0.85
| |
0
|
32.0
| ||
1
|
52.2
| ||
2
|
12.5
| ||
3-5
|
3.1
| ||
Age at first placement
|
3.74
|
2.98
| |
0–6 months
|
16.0
| ||
7 months–2 years
|
26.0
| ||
3–5 years
|
28.8
| ||
6–12 years
|
29.2
| ||
Years in current foster home
|
5.08
|
3.06
| |
0-2
|
23.5
| ||
3-5
|
25.3
| ||
6-7
|
25.3
| ||
8-12
|
25.8
| ||
Number of adverse childhood experiences1
|
3.00
|
1.60
| |
Violence exposure (range 0–4)2
|
0.71
|
1.14
| |
0
|
64.1
| ||
1-2
|
26.2
| ||
3-4
|
9.7
| ||
Serious neglect
|
86.3
| ||
Parent`s drug/alcohol abuse
|
55.3
| ||
Parent`s mental disorder
|
52.3
| ||
Parent`s mental disability
|
9.6
|
Cross-tabulations
were used to examine patterns of comorbidity, first between each of the
3 main diagnostic groups — Emotional disorders, ADHD and Behavioural
disorders — and all other disorders, and then among these 3 main
diagnostic groups only. These 3 groups were further recoded into 1
variable to examine the overlap between RAD and any of these 3 main
diagnostic groups. Estimates of the odds of comorbidity between any 2 of
4 diagnostic groups (Emotional disorders, ADHD disorders, Behavioural
disorders, and RAD) were calculated with logistic regression analyses.
In
the analyses of associations between possible risk factors and mental
disorder, the 5 diagnostic groups (Emotional disorders, ADHD disorders,
Behavioural disorders, RAD and Any disorders) were included as the
dependent variables in separate binary logistic regression analyses. To
reduce the number of predictors, the associations between single risk
factors and diagnostic groups were examined in preliminary analyses (see
Table 1
for information about the included predictors). Among the demographic
variables, Age, but not Gender or Parents ethnicity, was related to at
least 1 of the 5 diagnostic groups. Variables related to the child’s
placement history (Age at first placement, Number of placements, and
Time in current foster home) were all related to at least 1 diagnostic
group. Time in current foster home and Age at first placement were
highly inter-correlated (r = -0.69). To avoid collinearity, only Age at
first placement was included in the subsequent analyses.
Among
the possible risk factors reflecting care experiences in the family of
origin, as reported by the child welfare services, Parental substance
abuse, Mental illness and Mental disability were unrelated to any of
diagnostic groups. Five variables — Serious neglect, Exposure to
physical violence, Witnessing domestic violence, Exposure to emotional
abuse (threats, hostility, rejection, harsh verbal punishment), and
Witnessing emotional abuse towards other family members — all had a
significant associations with at least one diagnostic group. These 5
variables were then included in an exploratory principal component
analysis with oblimin rotation. The latter 4 of the 5 variables were
loaded on one factor with an eigenvalue of 2.18, explaining 43.7% of the
total variance, whereas Serious neglect was loaded as a separate
factor, with an eigenvalue of 1.08, explaining 21.1% of the total
variance. Based on these findings, the 4 variables loading on Factor 1
were added into a continuous variable termed Violence exposure, with a
range of 0–4 (M = 0.89, SD 1.22) and Cronbach’s alpha = 0.72. Thus, in
the final logistic regression analyses, the following predictors were
included: Age; Age at first placement; Number of placements; Violence
exposure; and Serious neglect. All of the predictors were used as
continuous variables, except for Serious neglect, which was defined as a
dichotomous variable (no = 0, yes = 1), using a simple contrast with no
serious neglect as the reference category. We first ran unadjusted
logistic regression analyses for each of the predictors. Next, each
predictor was included in an adjusted model to control for the 4 other
predictors. The results are presented as un-adjusted and adjusted odds
ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs. If a predictor only had a significant
contribution in the adjusted model and not in the unadjusted model, a
suppressor effect was suspected. Here, a Wald backward stepwise
regression procedure (exit criterion p = 0.05), starting with all of the predictors in the model, was used to identify the suppressor variables.
Researchers say children in foster care have much worse health than children in the general population.
Previous studies have suggested that children in foster care may develop physical and mental health issues, primarily as a result of the trauma they have experienced, such as abuse and neglect.
However, the authors of the new study - including Kristin Turney of the University of California-Irvine - note that no research has compared the health of children in foster care with that of children in the general population.
With this in mind, Turney and team analyzed 2011-2012 data from the National Survey of Children's Health, which included more than 900,000 children across the U.S. Of these, around 1.3 percent had been in foster care.
The researchers used logistic regression models to compare the risks of mental and physical health problems of children who had and had not spent time in foster care.
Foster care 'a risk factor for health problems in childhood'
On looking at the risks of physical health problems, the researchers found children who had been in foster care were twice as likely to have asthma and obesity and three times as likely to have hearing and vision problems, compared with children who had not spent time in foster care.When it came to mental health, children who had been in foster care were found to be at seven times greater risk of depression and five times greater risk of anxiety.
Behavioral problems were six times more likely among children who spent time in foster care, the team reports, and they were also at three times greater risk of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and twice as likely to have learning disabilities and developmental delays.
Turney says their study makes an "important contribution to the research community" by being the first to demonstrate that the health of children in foster care is much worse than children in other living conditions.
"Our findings also present serious implications for pediatricians by suggesting that foster care placement is a risk factor for health problems in childhood," she adds.
"This is typically a difficult-to-reach population, so having access to descriptive statistics on their living arrangements, physical well-being and behavior provided an excellent opportunity to help identify the health challenges they face.Read about a study that suggests depression may be passed down from mothers to daughters.
This study expands our understanding of the mental and physical health of these highly vulnerable children, but we must take a closer look if we are to understand how foster care really affects child well-being."
Kristin Turney
No comments:
Post a Comment